Select an area of expertise to find out more about our experience.
Find out more about our barristers and business support teams here.
Francesca Whitelaw KC is a leading specialist in public law and police law and took silk in 2023.
Described by Chambers UK as “a highly likeable advocate”, she represents public and private bodies across the country in all areas of civil law including judicial review, civil actions, data claims, professional discipline, human rights, inquests and public inquiries. Before taking silk she was appointed to the Attorney General’s A Panel of Counsel to the Crown since 2020. She is ranked in Chambers UK for Police Law, Professional Discipline and Inquests and Public Inquiries and in The Legal 500 for Police Law and Inquests and Inquiries. She has been shortlisted for Public Inquiries and Inquests Silk of the Year by Chambers UK for 2024.
Francesca is currently instructed as Counsel to the Inquiry for the Public Inquiry into the death of Dawn Sturgess (Salisbury Novichok poisonings) and she is instructed in the Omagh Bombings Inquiry. She previously acted in the Infected Blood Inquiry.
Francesca has represented Secretaries of State in most of the recent high profile terrorism inquests:
Francesca appeared with Jason Beer KC representing South Wales Police in the appeal to the Court of Appeal in the case of Bridges v South Wales Police, the first case in the world to consider the use of Automated Facial Recognition by Police. She was also previously instructed by the Ministry of Defence to represent former soldiers for the inquest into the death of Sean Benton, and the inquest into the death of Cheryl James, both of whom died at the Deepcut Barracks in 1995.
Francesca is a specialist in advising and representing police forces nationwide in all areas of police civil law. These include judicial review, inquests, civil actions for false imprisonment, assault, malicious prosecution, misfeasance, and negligence. She advises forces on all aspects of operational and policy matters. Francesca acted as the Independent Legal Advisor to the Police Misconduct Panel for the public hearing of allegations against Inspector Mackaill, which arose out of the ‘Plebgate’ incident.
Gatland and Others v Independent Police Complaints Commission [2018]
First Junior Counsel to Jeremy Johnson QC representing the Independent Office for Police Conduct in proceedings being brought by six claimants under Articles 6 and 8 and Article 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention. Two of the claimants also bring a claim in misfeasance in public office. The claims arise out of disciplinary proceedings brought against the officers.
R (on the application of Kashaba) v Chief Constable of Lancashire Constabulary [2016]
Acted on behalf of the Chief Constable in defence of an application for judicial review challenging the retention by police of an oral harassment warning issued to the Claimant.
R (on the application of Desmond Campbell) v IPCC [2015] EWHC 3424
Counsel to the IPCC in an application for judicial review of its appeal decisions concerning a Metropolitan Police investigation into complaints the Claimant made following the execution of a search warrant at his home.
R (on the application of McNeany) v Independent Police Complaints Commission [2014] EWHC 1873 (Admin)
Represented the IPCC for the judicial review of a decision to dismiss the Claimant’s appeal against the dismissal of his complaint to police that he had been blackmailed.
Laurance v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2013]
Counsel to the Commissioner in a claim, tried by judge and jury, for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment, assault and malicious prosecution, brought by a protestor following his arrest at a Stop the War demonstration in Hackney.
R (on the application of Driver) v Independent Police Complaints Commission [2012] EWHC 1271 (Admin)
Counsel to the IPCC in the substantive hearing of a claim for judicial review brought by a man challenging his treatment in police custody and the subsequent review of his complaints. The case particularly involved complaints concerning the removal of his clothing, following his attempts to harm himself with it.
Francesca has considerable experience of all aspects of public / administrative law work including judicial review, prison law, police law and human rights.
As A-Panel Counsel to the Crown, Francesca advises, and is instructed by, the Government Legal Department in false imprisonment, misfeasance, human rights and other claims brought against the Home Office, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Defence and other government bodies, and at inquests.
R (on the application of Ian Stewart-Brady) v (1) The Lord Chancellor (2) the First Tier Tribunal (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) (2017)
Appeared on behalf of the First Tier Tribunal in the hearing of the last set of legal proceedings brought by Ian Brady before his death. Brady sought to challenge the decision of the Tribunal not to appoint his choice of legal representative as well as the decision of the Lord Chancellor to refuse public funding. Both applications were rejected by the Administrative Court.
Chief Constable of Devon & Cornwall v HM Coroner for Plymouth, Torbay & South Devon & (1) Elber Twomey (2) Wojciechowska (2) Insurers of Wojciechowska (deceased) (4) Independent Police Complaints Commission [2013] EWHC 3729 (Admin)
Appeared on behalf of the Devon and Cornwall Constabulary for the judicial review which arose out of an inquest into the death of a child and a suicidal driver in circumstances where police had attempted to stop the suicidal driver’s vehicle.
(1) Daniel Cummings (2) Zahid Bashir (3) Geno Boyoh v Ministry of Justice [2013] EWHC 33 (QB)
Instructed as Junior Counsel to Jeremy Johnson QC representing the Ministry of Justice in a claim by prisoners at HMP Frankland, for damages for assault and misfeasance in public office by prison officers.
R (on the application of Ivor Adams) v Independent Police Complaints Commission [2013] EWHC 2650 (Admin)
Appeared on behalf of the IPCC for the judicial review of a decision to grant dispensation for a police force from the statutory complaints procedure.
The whole spectrum of Francesca’s practice encompasses Human Rights Law. She is currently instructed, together with Jeremy Johnson QC and Alice Meredith, by the Independent Office for Police Conduct in proceedings being brought by six claimants under Articles 6 and 8 and Article 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention.
Potter v Crown Prosecution Service [2016]
Instructed by the CPS in a successful strike out application. The Claimant had sought to claim damages for alleged breaches of Articles 10 and 11 ECHR following her acquittal at trial in a prosecution for an alleged offence under section 4 of the Public Order Act 1986. The prosecution arose out of an animal rights protest at an airport. Permission to appeal was refused by the Central London County Court and by the Court of Appeal.
Francesca has extensive experience of inquests, particularly those arising out of terrorist attacks, deaths in prison and police custody, deaths following police contact (including police pursuits) and deaths involving army personnel.
Fishmongers Hall Inquests (2020-2021)
instructed for the Secretary of State for Justice and the Secretary of State for the Home Department in the inquests into the deaths arising out of the terror attack which took place at Fishmongers Hall.
Inquest touching the death of Miranda Stevenson (2020)
Counsel to the Chief Constable of Surrey Police for the inquest into the death of a woman in police custody.
London Bridge and Borough Market Inquests (2019)
represented the Secretary of State for the inquests into the deaths arising out of the terror attacks on London Bridge and Borough Market.
Onese Power Inquest (2019)
acted for the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis in the renewed inquest into the death of Onese Power, a motorcyclist who died in the course of a police pursuit in 1997.
Westminster Bridge Inquests (2018)
appeared on behalf of the Secretary of State at the inquest into the death of Khalid Masood, the attacker responsible for the terrorist attack on Westminster Bridge and at New Palace Yard, who was lawfully killed by police.
Deepcut: Inquest touching the death of Sean Benton (2018)
represented two former soldiers for the renewed inquest into the death of Sean Benton, a young soldier who died at the Deepcut Barracks in 1995.
Inquest touching the death of Jagdip Randhawa (2016)
represented the Chief Constable of Derbyshire Constabulary for the 3-week jury inquest into the death of a 19-year old Leeds University student. Mr Randhawa died in hospital, having suffered a serious brain injury following a punch by a professional boxer, Clifton Ty Mitchell, who was subsequently convicted of manslaughter. Mr Mitchell was on bail at the time of the incident.
Inquest touching the death of Cheryl James (2016)
instructed by the Ministry of Defence to act on behalf of two former soldiers in the further inquest into the death of Cheryl James at the Deepcut Barracks in 1995.
Inquest touching the death of Wiktoria Was, deceased (2015)
Counsel to the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis for the jury inquest into the death of a 13-year old girl who died when a car, which was being pursued by police at the time, crashed into the vehicle in which she was travelling. The driver of the car pleaded guilty to causing death by dangerous driving and other offences.
Inquest touching the death of Joshua Brown, deceased (2015)
Counsel to the Chief Constable of Surrey Police for the 3-week jury inquest into the death of a 21-year old soldier who was hit by a police vehicle attending an emergency call on the A31 in Surrey in foggy weather.
Inquest touching the death of Henry Hicks (2015-2016)
Represented the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis in a successful application for anonymity for police officers, who had been subject to death threats, in the context of the inquest into the death of an 18-year old boy who was riding a Vespa scooter at the time of his death. The IPCC are investigating whether police officers were pursuing Henry at the time as well as previous police contact with him.
Inquest touching the death of Harry Kirkham (2015)
Counsel to the Chief Constable of West Midlands Police for the jury inquest into the death of a 15-year old boy who died of a traumatic brain injury after being hit by a police car in March 2015. Harry had been free-running with his friends,
Inquest touching the death of Frances Andrade (2014)
Represented the Chief Constable of Surrey Police at the inquest into the death of a concert violinist who was found dead after giving evidence against a couple who sexually abused her while she was at Chetham’s School of Music in Manchester.
Inquest touching the death of Barry deceased (2013)
Counsel to the Chief Constable of Kent Police in the three-week jury inquest into the death of a 14-year old boy who died after drinking methadone (see R (on the application of Kent County Council) v HM Coroner for Kent (North-West District) [2012] EWHC 2768 (Admin)).
Francesca advises and represents public and private bodies in matters involving a broad spectrum of information law issues. Her experience includes addressing issues arising under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000; challenges to information disclosed during DBS checks and security vetting procedures; claims under the Data Protection Act and GDPR; and other civil actions and public law challenges concerning information retention and sharing including those involving ECHR rights.
Edward Bridges v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2020] EWCA Civ 1058
with Jason Beer QC, Francesca represented the Chief Constable in the Court of Appeal in the first case in the world to consider the use by police of facial recognition technology by law enforcement agencies.
R (on the application of HA) v (1) Disclosure and Barring Service (2) Chief Constable of West Midlands Police (3) Secretary of State (Interested Party) [2019]
Appeared on behalf of the Chief Constable of West Midlands Police in successfully resisting a claim for judicial review challenging the disclosure of the applicant’s youth convictions The claim was brought under the GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 which were not in force at the time of the claims which were the subject of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in In Re an application by Lorraine Gallagher for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); R (P, G & W) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (P) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC. The Claimant has sought permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
R v Clodagh Hartley
Represented the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis in the Central Criminal Court at a hearing which arose out of Operation Elveden (the investigation into allegations of inappropriate payments to police officers and public officials opened as a result of documents provided by News International to Operation Weeting, the phone hacking investigation). The case concerned the collateral use of information disclosed in criminal proceedings.
Francesca regularly advises and acts for police forces at misconduct hearings, including the Police Appeals Tribunal and deals with judicial review relating to misconduct issues. Cases have included the discharge of firearms and taser, deaths in custody, corruption, computer misuse, rape, sexual harassment and assault.
Gross Misconduct Proceedings concerning Inspector Mackaill (Plebgate) (2015-2016)
Acted as independent legal advisor to the Panel in gross misconduct proceedings against a police inspector which arose out of his involvement in, and statements to the press following, a meeting with Andrew Mitchell MP on 12th October 2012. The meeting arose out of incident which became known as ‘Plebgate’.
In the matter of Olaseni (Seni) Lewis deceased [2015-2017]
Junior Counsel advising the Independent Police Complaints Commission on matters concerning the death of 23-year old Seni Lewis, who died following police restraint at the Bethlem psychiatric hospital.
Gross Misconduct Proceedings against an Officer (2015)
Presenting Counsel for the Chief Constable of a Police Force in gross misconduct proceedings against an officer who had discharged a Taser against a suspect during the course of an arrest.
Re police disciplinary proceedings (2013)
Counsel to the Commissioner in disciplinary proceedings, recommended by the IPCC, against a Hackney police officer who it was found used excessive force against a member of the public during the course of an arrest, leading to serious facial injury. The officer was dismissed following a week’s hearing.
Francesca is a ranked junior specialising in police and government law. She advises and represents public bodies across the country in all areas of civil law including judicial review, civil actions, professional discipline and human rights claims. She also has notable expertise in inquests, appearing in some of the most high profile inquests in recent years.
The public hearings in the independent inquiry into the death of Dawn Sturgess from novichok…
Discover moreThe public inquiry into the death of Dawn Sturgess from novichok poisoning begins on 14…
Discover moreThe latest highlights from our Data Protection and Information Law experts are…
5 Essex Chambers is delighted to have been shortlisted in the Chambers…
Instructing Francesca
Please contact Mark Waller if you have any questions or wish to instruct us.
Inquests and Public Inquiries:
“She is an excellent advocate. She is a terrific person to be working with.”
“Francesca has a good head for all the details and strategy.”
Police Law:
“Francesca Whitelaw KC is utterly charming and forceful when she needs to be. She was really impressive on her feet.”
“She is very easy to work with but also a very effective cross-examiner.”
“Francesca is an astute tactician and calm and persuasive in court.” (Inquests and Public Inquiries)
“Francesca is very hard working , sensible and amiable.” (Police Law)
“Francesca is an impressive barrister.” (Professional Discipline)
“Francesca is a real heavy hitter.” (Inquests and Public Inquiries)
“She is really knowledgeable in the inquests and is great at mapping out the process to make an inquest effective.” (Inquests and Public Inquiries)
‘Francesca is approachable and devastating in court. She is robust but fair and manages to navigate a careful line of maintaining both her client and the court confidence.’ (Police Law)
“Francesca is concise and tough. She is hugely personable and clients see confidence in her. She manages to get to grips with complicated scientific topics very impressively.”
‘Extremely well organised, very bright, an excellent knowledge of coronial and inquiry.’
“Seriously bright and has extremely good judgement; she’s also highly adept at dealing with the documents.” (Police Law)
“Superbly knowledgeable about inquests and coroners really like her, so she’s a good person to go to if you are a police person looking at a difficult inquest.” (Police Law)
“A very hard worker; she is charming, has good tactical skills and produces impressive precise advocacy.” (Professional Discipline)
“She can look through a huge amount of detail and see the core issues. She is also likeable and professional with lay and professional clients.” (Inquests & Public Inquiries)
“Extremely knowledgeable in the law governing inquests and inquiries, and has a wealth of experience in high-profile cases. Her expertise in national security work is particularly notable, her advocacy is impressive, and Francesca works well in a team.” (Inquest and Inquiries)
“Francesca is cerebral, thorough and has excellent judgement and can hold her own among silks. She knows her cases better than anyone and is able to work with all sorts of clients at the highest level.” (Police Law – Defendant)
“She has very good attention to detail and is all over the documents.” (Police Law)
“She is very clever and works exceptionally hard.” (Police Law)
“She is really good in legal arguments – she is persuasive and to the point.” (Police Law)
“She provides great analysis. She is likeable in court and very intelligent.” (Professional Discipline)
“She is very hard-working and has a fantastic eye for detail. An absolute pleasure to work with, and good at handling clients.” (Professional Discipline)
“She is absolutely superb – a really effective senior junior. She is absolutely steeped in inquest work.” (Inquests and Inquiries)
“She is tireless, highly intelligent and has very, very good judgement. She is a sound tactician and is very good at knowing how to present your client’s case to maximum advantage.” (Inquests and Inquiries)
“She is absolutely excellent and incredibly thorough. She is very well liked by clients and very hard-working, and excellent on her feet.” (Inquests and Inquiries)
“Francesca is a class act. Excellent judgement and impeccable court craft. She is very well respected by coroners.” (Inquests and Inquiries)
“A very experienced junior, thorough in her preparation and charming in court.” (Police Law)
“She will develop a prominent practice in the coming years. She quickly gets on top of a case and is thoroughly prepared in complex, multi-handed inquests.” (Inquests and Public Inquiries)
“She has stood out for the constructive assistance she has provided to the court.” (Inquests and Inquiries)
“A fantastic junior who is completely reliable, overlooks nothing, is extremely personable and has a very nice manner in court.” (Police Law)
“Really first rate: careful, detailed, on top of the brief and charming with clients.” (Police Law)
“She has a strong knowledge of deeper case law.” (Inquests and Public Inquiries)
“She combines an excellent analytical approach with an engaging court manner.” (Police Law)
“A fantastic junior who is highly intelligent and has the answer before you ask the question.”
“Quickly gets on top of even the biggest cases, and stands out for providing constructive assistance.” (Police Law)
“Personable and very thorough in her work. She thinks outside of the box and analyses the material well.” (Professional Discipline)
“Fantastically well prepared.” (Professional Discipline)
“Quickly gets on top of even the biggest cases….personable and very thorough…..fantastically well prepared…..experienced in complex judicial reviews….a highly likeable advocate”
“A dedicated representative of police forces across the country. She handles all aspects of civil law relating to the police and frequently appears in misconduct hearings before the Police Appeals Tribunal. She is also experienced in complex judicial reviews arising out of disciplinary proceedings.” (Professional Discipline)
“Very well prepared and on top of the detail.” (Professional Discipline)
“She is hard-working and always well prepared. Her written submissions are comprehensive and she manages her hearings with confidence. She’s a highly likeable advocate.” (Professional Discipline)
“Well known for her expertise in police law matters relating to the regulation and discipline of law enforcers” (Professional Discipline)
“She is very effective and doesn’t overstate her case.” (Professional Discipline)
An advocate with “commendable charm and good humour” – Court of Appeal in Pryor v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [2011] EWCA Civ 749
“A dedicated representative of police forces across the country…experienced in complex judicial reviews…Very well prepared and on top of the detail…”
Click here to view