Select an area of expertise to find out more about our experience.
Find out more about our barristers and business support teams here.
Following the dismissal last year of the Claimants’ claims for malicious prosecution and misfeasance in public office, Norfolk Police sought payment of their trial costs on the indemnity basis. The trial judge, Mr Justice Cotter, has handed down judgment acceding to that application, observing that various aspects of the Claimants’ conduct of the trial “amount to unreasonable behaviour that amply merit the award of indemnity costs on the limited basis sought”. The judgment can be found here:
Breeze and Wilson v Chief Constable of Norfolk Constabulary [2026] EWHC 1937 (KB)
Cotter J accepted the Defendant’s submission that the Claimants’ pursuit of the claim to trial was so unreasonable as to take their conduct “out of the norm”. The following aspects of the evidence and/or the points taken at trial were highlighted:
Finally, the Judge roundly rejected the Claimants’ submission that the Defendant should be denied indemnity costs because of a failure to pursue an application for strike out/summary judgment and/or because of its own conduct of the proceedings.
This decision finally marks the end of this exceptionally long-running and hard-fought litigation, initially commenced in 2015. Charlotte Ventham KC has acted for Norfolk Police throughout.
16 April 2024
Chambers is delighted to announce that Head of Chambers, Jason Beer KC is one of only…
Discover more15 February 2023
This is an ‘Original Manuscript’ of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in the Journal…
Discover more14 February 2022
The first hearings of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry commenced today. Previously a non-statutory…
Discover more

