Select an area of expertise to find out more about our experience.
Find out more about our barristers and business support teams here.
Normally when a contract transfers under the TUPE regs (Reg 3) it is trite law that the contract maintains its integrity such that any post transfer contract changes are broadly impermissible.
The situation becomes more complicated where an employee who is transferring brings with them an active claim against the transferor (the company they are leaving). This has to be dealt with by the transferee (receiving company) – who steps into the shoes of the transferor and should have been given notice of this claim before the transfer took place.
The recent case of AC v Huntercombe (No12) Ltd & Ors sheds light on a more nuanced situation. Here an ex psychiatric patient tried to enforce liability on the transferee of a claim he was pursuing against a third party involving the vicarious liability of the transferor. The CA held, in this case, liability for the actions of a third party, imposed vicariously on the transferor, does not transfer to the transferee on a relevant transfer. This is because the TUPE regulations are derived from European legislation (still relevant) and do not concern themselves with rights other than those that exist directly between the transferring employee and the transferor.
16 April 2024
Chambers is delighted to announce that Head of Chambers, Jason Beer KC is one of only…
Discover more15 February 2023
This is an ‘Original Manuscript’ of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in the Journal…
Discover more14 February 2022
The first hearings of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry commenced today. Previously a non-statutory…
Discover more

