The Right to be Forgotten

5 May 2020

The English law position on the right to be forgotten is that it falls to be determined following a balancing exercise, weighing the rights of the individual with the rights to freedom of expression, including to access and impart information (NT1 & NT2 v Google LLC). At a European level, it has recently been clarified that the right to be forgotten extends only to publishing within the EU – there is no basis in EU law for global de-listing. Furthermore, two German Constitutional Court decisions (RTBF I and RTBF II) have highlighted the limits to which search engines can rely on journalistic exemptions for data processing, and advocated for a more blended approach to the question of de-listing or removal of information, rather than the CJEU’s approach which starts from the premise that individuals have control over ‘their information’. It’s likely that the CJEU will have to resolve the issue in time. Since the GCC’s preferred ‘blended approach’ bears a strong similarity to the English balancing exercise, that might provide scope for a drastic reappraisal of how right to be forgotten requests should be handled.

John Goss
 


Authors

John Goss

Call 2015

Search

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and event updates.

Subscribe

Popular

16 April 2024

Chambers is delighted to announce that Head of Chambers, Jason Beer KC is one of only…

Discover more

14 February 2022

The first hearings of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry commenced today.  Previously a non-statutory…

Discover more

19 December 2023

A message from Head of Chambers, Jason Beer KC, looking back at the past 12…

Discover more

Portfolio Builder

Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)