Background

John specialises in police law, data protection and information law, public and administrative law (including judicial review, human rights and national security), and inquests and public inquiries.

Recognised as a Leading Junior in Police Law, Inquests & Inquiries and Data Protection by both Chambers UK and the Legal 500, John is commended for his intellectual precision, advocacy skills, and calm authority under pressure.

Major cases John has recently been involved in include:

  • The Southport Inquiry, as counsel to the inquiry
  • The Independent Inquiry relating to Afghanistan, the Dawn Sturgess Inquiry, and the Omagh Bombing Inquiry
  • XGY v Chief Constable of Sussex Police & Crown Prosecution Service [2025] EWCA Civ 1230, a high-profile appeal relating to immunity from suit
  • Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Aswat [2025] EWHC 786 (KB), in relation to the notification requirements to be applied to a major Al Qaeda terrorist after his release from US custody
  • R (Coventry City Council) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWHC 2929 (Admin), on the procurement of asylum accommodation
  • Acting for the police in civil jury trials for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment

He is a member of the Attorney General’s B Panel (appointed 2024 following a term on the C Panel) and has appeared before the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, and High Court, with a broad practice spanning civil, public and regulatory jurisdictions.

John acts for a wide range of clients including police forces, central Government, local authorities, regulators, charities, private companies, and individuals. Before the Bar, he served as an officer in the British Army, with operational tours in Iraq and Afghanistan.

John is qualified to accept instructions via Direct Public Access.

Expertise

John is ranked as a Leading Junior (Band 2) in Police Law by both Chambers UK and the Legal 500, with clients praising him as “brilliant, quietly intellectual and a great advocate” and as “an exceptional legal analyst and persuasive advocate in this specialist area.”

He is frequently instructed in complex and high-profile civil claims against the police, including those involving false imprisonment, assault, malicious prosecution, misfeasance in public office, and breaches of the Human Rights Act and Equality Act. His trial experience encompasses civil jury trials and High Court proceedings. He is adept at managing sensitive or reputationally challenging cases.

John has acted in a number of leading police law cases, including:

  • XGY v Chief Constable of Sussex & CPS [2025] EWCA Civ 1230 – a landmark Court of Appeal ruling on immunity from suit from information law and human rights claims
  • Fittschen v Chief Constable of Dorset Police [2022] EWHC 399 (QB) – High Court wrongful arrest litigation
  • Multiple civil jury trials for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution

He has substantial expertise in terrorism-related litigation, acting for police forces and Counter-Terrorism Police in cases under the Terrorism Acts. He is the go-to counsel for terrorism notification order litigation, having appeared in every recent reported case, including:

  • Chief Constable of West Midlands Police v Geele [2023] EWHC 2819 (KB)
  • Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Aswat [2025] EWHC 786 (KB)
  • Chief Constable of Sussex v Alderi [2025] EWHC 2823 (KB)

John also acts in public law matters arising from police decisions, including judicial reviews and case stated appeals relating to civil powers under the Proceeds of Crime Act, Dangerous Dogs Act, firearms licensing, and more.

John has exceptional knowledge of data protection and information law as they relate to law enforcement, including claims for misuse of private information and breaches of Part 3 of the Data Protection Act 2018. He is also regularly instructed to advise on investigatory powers and on cases in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal.

John has an extensive practice in information law, and ranked as a Leading Junior for Data Protection by both Chambers UK and Legal 500.

He represents both claimants (data subjects) and defendants (data controllers) in complex litigation involving misuse of private information, breach of confidence, and UK GDPR/Data Protection Act claims.

Notable highlights include:

  • Acting for the Crown Prosecution Service in the leading Court of Appeal case on immunity from suit for information law claims (XGY v Chief Constable of Sussex & CPS [2025] EWCA Civ 1230)
  • Representing the Home Secretary in the Court of Appeal on confidentiality of asylum files (Re RH [2020] EWCA Civ 1001)
  • Acting for the Information Commissioner in Freedom of Information cases relating to national security (Cole v Information Commissioner & MOD [2024] UKFTT 1120 (GRC); Dyke (Airwars) v Information Commissioner & MOD)
  • Acting in the Upper Tribunal in Kanter-Webber v Information Commissioner & Chief Constable of Hampshire [2025] UKUT 171 (AAC) in the leading case on FOIA and police misconduct proceedings
  • Acting for Ofgem in EIR cases relating to its investigation into the Drax powerplant
  • Regular appearances in High Court and County Court on data protection and information law claims, including for police forces and other law enforcement bodies, local authorities, educational institutions, business, charities, regulators, and individuals
  • Advising and drafting on data sharing agreements, including cross-border data transfers and innovative data repurposing schemes
  • Acting in Investigatory Powers Tribunal proceedings related to RIPA/IPA

John regularly delivers training to police forces, government departments, and other public bodies on data protection, information sharing, and investigatory powers, and is a founding editor of 5 Essex Chambers’ widely read ‘Data Brief’ newsletter.

John is recognised as a Leading Junior in Inquests & Inquiries by Chambers UK (Band 3) and the Legal 500 (Band 4) for his extensive experience representing a diverse range of clients, including police forces, government departments, families, and other interested persons in both jury and non-jury inquests.

He regularly advises on and appears in complex Article 2 inquests concerning deaths in custody, police operations, and public safety, as well as non-Article 2 inquests. Notable recent cases include:

  • The Reading Terror Attack Inquests for Thames Valley Police in 2024
  • Inquests into deaths in prison custody for His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service
  • An inquest into the death of the employee of a major supermarket chain linked to issues at work, for her employer
  • An Article 2 inquest into the self-inflicted death of a 14-year-old boy who absconded from foster care, for a police force
  • Service-related inquests for the Ministry of Defence, including into military deaths on operations and training both in the UK and overseas
  • An inquest for the family of a woman who died in a high-speed car crash in Qatar.

John’s military background gives him unique insight into service deaths and military investigations, making him an invaluable advocate in inquests involving armed forces personnel.

He is also well-versed in procedural and statutory applications such as resumption of inquests and fresh inquest applications under section 13 of the Coroners Act 1988.

John is an accomplished counsel in major public inquiries, combining his public law expertise with his military and policing knowledge.

He is currently counsel to the Southport Inquiry, focusing on themes of policing, counter-terrorism, weapons regulation, and social care.

His inquiry experience includes:

  • Representation of Counter-Terrorism Policing South-East at the Dawn Sturgess Inquiry into her death by novichok poisoning
  • Serving as first junior counsel to the Royal Military Police in the Afghanistan Inquiry, investigating alleged unlawful killings by UK Special Forces
  • Acting for Counter-Terrorism Police Headquarters and the Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Command (SO15) in the Omagh Bombing Inquiry
  • Appearing for the Mayor of London at Phase 1 of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry
  • Large-scale disclosure and privilege reviews for Ofgem in the Renewable Heat Incentive Inquiry

John regularly appears in the Administrative Court and other judicial review forums, advising and representing government departments, police forces, and public bodies in high-stakes public law challenges. He is highly skilled in drafting robust judicial review claims and grounds of defence, advising on procedure, and managing complex multi-party litigation.

He has acted in judicial review cases involving:

  • The procurement and location of asylum accommodation: R (Coventry City Council) v SSHD [2025] EWHC 2929 (Admin) and R (Wolverhampton City Council & ors) v SSHD [2022] EWHC 1721 (Admin)
  • Challenges to police complaint handling under the Police Reform Act 2002: R (Shakoor) v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [2018] EWHC 1709 (Admin)
  • Claims about criminal investigations, including decisions on bail, about charging decisions and the Victim’s Right of Review, and about human trafficking
  • Challenges to policies and decisions about law enforcement information recording, sharing, and retention
  • Police vetting decisions (and he also acts in SVAP proceedings)
  • Decisions in relation to prisons and probation, including recalls to prison, licence conditions, and categorisation of prisoners
  • Challenges to decisions of public inquiries: R (IIA126) v Chairman of the Independent Inquiry relating to Afghanistan [2025] EWHC 2842 (Admin)
  • Costs orders in criminal proceedings in the Crown Court
  • Decisions by the magistrates’ courts under the Dangerous Dogs Act, Proceeds of Crime Act, and anti-terrorism legislation, such as R (Etienne) v MPS [2019] EWHC 804 (Admin), R (Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset v Crown Court at Bristol [2022] EWHC 1771 (Admin), and R (Chief Constable of GMP) v Crown Court at Manchester Minshull Street (Div Court, 2022).

Human rights issues are frequently at the core of John’s work, particularly involving Articles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

He advises on liability and damages under the Human Rights Act 1998 and appears in a wide range of courts and tribunals where human rights are engaged—either on standalone bases or alongside other legal issues.

John appeared in the landmark case XGY v Crown Prosecution Service [2025] EWCA Civ 1230, which re-affirmed the principle of immunity from suit for acts done in the course of legal proceedings in the context of human rights and information claims.

John maintains a busy and high-profile disciplinary practice, primarily representing the Appropriate Authority in police misconduct proceedings.

He is experienced in a wide range of serious allegations, including police corruption, criminal offences, misuse of force, operational dishonesty, financial impropriety, improper access to police data, sexual misconduct, and discriminatory behaviour.

John’s expertise includes drafting Regulation 30 notices, advising on the conduct of investigations and hearings, and representing forces in appeals to the Police Appeals Tribunal and judicial reviews of public complaint handling.

Significant cases include:

  • The misconduct proceedings and appeal of an officer dismissed for excessive force against a vulnerable child
  • Dismissals for failing to investigate domestic harassment and dishonesty in official records
  • Cases involving racist and homophobic misconduct
  • Cover-up attempts relating to police vehicle collisions
  • Misuse of police systems to obtain private information and subsequent misconduct
  • The dismissal of an officer for mishandling of firearms

Featured Professional Discipline & Regulatory cases


The misconduct proceedings and appeal of PC K, who was dismissed without notice after he was proven to have used excessive force against a Black child with learning difficulties);


The misconduct proceedings of PC R, who was dismissed without notice after failing to investigate allegations of domestic harassment and making dishonest entries on the crime log;


The misconduct proceedings of PC M, who was dismissed without notice for racist and homophobic behaviour while off-duty;


The misconduct proceedings and appeal of PC L, who was dismissed without notice for attempting to cover up a minor collision in a police vehicle, including by pressuring a more junior officer to lie about what occurred;


The misconduct proceedings of PC S, who was dismissed without notice after he misused police systems to find out information about a missing person, and then formed an emotional relationship with that person.

John regularly acts in both multi-track and fast-track personal injury claims involving occupiers’ liability, employer’s liability, public liability, and highway authority liability under the Highways Act 1980. His practice encompasses advising on liability and quantum, drafting pleadings, and representing clients at contested hearings and case management conferences.

Many of John’s public and police law instructions have a personal injury element, and he is regularly instructed by government departments, local authorities, and police forces to handle complex injury claims with professionalism and strategic insight.

Latest News & Events

Read all

9 December 2025

John Goss acted for Essex Police in a six-day civil jury trial of Melvyn Pilgrim’s…

Discover more

5 December 2025

The Rt Hon Lord Hughes of Ombersley, a former Justice of the Supreme Court has…

Discover more

John Goss appears for Home Secretary in major asylum accommodation judicial review

The question of where asylum seekers should be accommodated has been a…

Webinar: how information law arises through other legal claims

Aaron Moss, John Goss and Eleanor Guildford hosted a highly popular CPD-accredited…

"John is impressive. He is very thorough in his research. He has a real gravitas."


"John is impressive in every respect: measured, meticulous and unflappable under pressure. He navigates sensitive matters with real care and authority, earning trust from all sides."


"He is the perfect representative for his clients, demonstrating what confident, caring, intelligent and diligent counsel he is.”


"John's legal preparation, written argument and oral advocacy are faultless. You can rely on him to guide you through difficult and complex areas with confidence”


Instructing John
Please contact Dan Waple if you have any questions or wish to instruct us.

Call +44 (0)20 7410 2000 or click here to email

Education & Qualifications

  • 2015 – Called to the Bar by Gray’s Inn
  • 2015 – Nottingham Law School, BPTC (Outstanding)
  • 2014 – Nottingham Law School, Graduate Diploma in Law (Distinction)
  • 2013 – Open University, BA (Hons) in International Studies (1st)
  • 2007 – Commissioning Course, Royal Military Academy Sandhurst
  • 2006 – Pembroke College, Cambridge University MA (Cantab) in Classics

Memberships

  • Administrative Law Bar Association
  • Personal Injury Bar Association
  • Institution of Royal Engineers

Awards

  • 2024 – Appointed to the Attorney General’s B Panel of Counsel
  • 2015 – Taylor Prize for best performance on BPTC
  • 2014 – Law School Prize for best performance on GDL
  • 2013 & 2014 – David Karmel Entrance Award and Bedingfield Scholarship from Gray’s Inn
  • 2007 – Queen’s Medal, Trust Medal and various other awards at RMAS

  

Chambers UK 2026

Inquests and Public Inquiries:

“John is impressive in every respect: measured, meticulous and unflappable under pressure. He navigates sensitive matters with real care and authority, earning trust from all sides.”

“John is a brilliant mind and an effective advocate.”

“John is very knowledgeable in military matters and very on top of the intricacies in procedural matters.”

Police Law:

“John Goss is working beyond his call. He is exceptional.”

“John Goss is very thorough, he really understands the detail. He is a very nice advocate, calm in his manner and effective at getting his point across. He is a good opponent and easy to work with.”

Data Protection:

“John is impressive. He is very thorough in his research. He has a real gravitas.”

The Legal 500 2026

Police Law:

“John is an exceptional legal analyst and persuasive advocate in this specialist area.”

Inquests and Inquiries:

“He is extremely knowledgeable, thorough and forensic. In making his submissions, he has the gravitas and authority of a silk.”

Chambers UK 2025

Police Law:

“He is an invaluable source of reassurance to clients.”

“John Goss finds the best option by identifying positives, negatives, risks and implications. He gets to the crux of the issues, and his preparation and attention to detail are flawless.”

Inquests and Public Inquiries:

“John is a superb oral advocate. He is very direct, to the point and gets his point across in few words very effectively.”

“He has a brilliant advocacy style and his legal acumen is outstanding.”

Data Protection:

“His advocacy skills are particularly impressive. He is nimble and sharp, and delivers submissions or cross-examination with focus and logic.”

Chambers UK 2024

“John’s legal preparation, written argument and oral advocacy are faultless. You can rely on him to guide you through difficult and complex areas with confidence.” (Police Law: Mainly Defendant)

“He is the perfect representative for his clients, demonstrating what confident, caring, intelligent and diligent counsel he is.” (Police Law: Mainly Defendant)

“His knowledge and acumen are outstanding for someone of such recent call.” (Inquests & Public Inquiries)

“John is very calm and efficient and handled the matter well.” (Inquests & Public Inquiries)

Chambers UK 2023

“A very clever individual whose written work is compelling and absolutely meticulous. He is someone you can count on to deliver what you need, when you need it.”

Click here to view

Affiliations

 

Affiliations

 

Affiliations

Portfolio Builder

Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)