Select an area of expertise to find out more about our experience.
Find out more about our barristers and business support teams here.
Select an area of expertise to find out more about our experience.
Find out more about our barristers and business support teams here.
Georgina Wolfe is recognised as one of the leading juniors at the Public Law Bar, specialising in police law, public law, human rights, inquests, public inquiries and civil claims against public authorities. She is ranked as a Star Individual by Chambers UK for both Police Law and Inquests & Public Inquiries, is a member of the Attorney General’s A Panel of Counsel and is regularly instructed in the UK’s most significant public law and appellate cases.
Georgina won Chambers UK Inquests and Public Inquiries Junior of the Year 2025. She has been shortlisted for the Legal 500 Public Law Junior of the Year 2026, 2025 and 2024.
Georgina is ranked as a Star Individual in Chambers UK for Police Law and Inquests and Public Inquiries. She is ranked as Tier 1 in the Legal 500 for Police Law and Inquests and Inquiries.
She is frequently instructed in cases raising issues of constitutional importance, national security, policing powers and human rights, including two forthcoming Supreme Court appeals, Chief Constable of Sussex Police & Crown Prosecution Service v XGY and R (L1T FM Holdings UK Ltd) v Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. She also appeared in R (Cabinet Office) v Chair of the Covid Inquiry, Belhaj v Jack Straw and others, and, in the Supreme Court, R (Roberts) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and R (Catt and T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and ACPO. She has particular expertise in cases at the intersection of national security, policing, public law and human rights.
Georgina is regularly instructed in high-profile statutory and public inquiries, acting for government departments, police forces and other core participants. Her experience includes the Covid Inquiry (for the Rt Hon. Boris Johnson), the Dawn Sturgess Inquiry (for HM Government), the Infected Blood Inquiry (for the Department of Health and Social Care) and the Undercover Policing Inquiry (for two police forces), as well as numerous high-profile Article 2 inquests. She has appeared in inquests into the deaths arising from the Fishmongers’ Hall terror attacks (for West Midlands Police), and into the deaths of Carl Sargeant (for the Labour Party), Max Clifford (for the Ministry of Justice) and Geoff Gray at Deepcut Barracks (for the MoD).
Georgina is a sought-after speaker and trainer, delivering seminars and masterclasses for solicitors, police forces, government departments and other public authorities.
Georgina edits 5 Essex Chambers’ police law journal, ‘The Beat’, with Beatrice Collier. She co-authored two chapters of National Security Law, Procedure and Practice (OUP, 2024) with Charlotte Ventham KC and Rory Phillips KC, and The Path to Pupillage (Sweet & Maxwell, 2008; Third Edition 2013) with Alexander Robson.
She also co-hosted the Middle Temple Pupillage Podcast with Beatrice Collier.
Georgina was runner up in the inaugural First 100 Years’ Inspirational Women in Law Award.
Recent highlights
Georgina has been shortlisted for Public Law Junior of the Year 2026, 2025 and 2024 in the Legal 500 Awards.
Georgina undertakes all areas of public law work, including prison law, judicial review, human rights and inquests. She has particular experience of challenges to search warrants and prosecution decisions. She regularly appears in permission and substantive hearings before the Administrative Court (including Divisional Courts) as well as appeals up to the Supreme Court.
Chief Constable of Sussex Police & Crown Prosecution Service v XGY [2025] EWCA Civ 1230
acting in the appeal relating to the scope of advocates’ immunity, breaches of Articles 3 and 8 and victim status under section 7 of the Human Rights Act 1998. The Supreme Court hearing is listed for October (with Bobby Talalay and led by Jason Beer KC).
R (L1T FM Holdings UK Limited) v Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster [2025] EWCA Civ 1528 and [2024] EWHC 2963 (Admin)
instructed throughout the proceedings, from first instance to the forthcoming Supreme Court appeal. Georgina successfully applied for the declaration under section 6 of the Justice and Security Act 2013 permitting a closed material application to be made to the court. This was the first such declaration in proceedings brought pursuant to the National Security and Investment Act 2021 and the first appeal heard on the effects of the 2021 Act.
R (Fahad Ansari) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police and the Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWHC 472 (Admin) and [2025] EWHC 3330 (Admin)
acting in the ongoing challenge to a Schedule 7 port stop. The question of whether AF(No3) disclosure is required is soon to be heard by the Court of Appeal.
R (Harry Miller) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and the Chief Constable of Lincolnshire Police
counsel for the Chief Constable in this forthcoming challenge to the Home Office Counting Rules (listed for two days in November 2026)
R (Cabinet Office) v Chair of the Covid Inquiry [2023] EWHC 1702 (Admin)
junior counsel for the Interested Party, the Rt Hon Boris Johnson, in the judicial review of the Chair’s decision to request unredacted WhatsApp messages (with Lord Pannick KC and Jason Pobjoy).
Belhaj v Jack Straw, Sir Mark Allen, Security and Intelligence Service, Security Service, Attorney General, Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Home Office
on the Defendants’ counsel team in this closed material procedure case concerning alleged complicity in extraordinary rendition and torture. The claim was settled following an apology issued by the Prime Minister.
R (Roberts) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2015] UKSC 79, [2016] 1 WLR 210
appeal challenging s60 stop and search powers, led by Jeremy Johnson QC (as he then was)
R (Catt and T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and ACPO [2015] UKSC 9; [2015] A.C. 1065
linked appeals relating to police retention of information about a protester and a harassment warning letter, led by Jeremy Johnson QC
R (TD) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2014] EWCA Civ 585
appeal concerning the lawfulness of police retention of crime reports, led by Jeremy Johnson QC (as he then was)
R (E7) v Chairman of the Azelle Rodney Inquiry [2014] EWHC 452 (Admin)
challenging the findings of a public inquiry on behalf of E7, led by Samantha Leek QC
Brookfield Aviation International Ltd v Guildford Crown Court [2015] EWHC 3465 (Admin)
challenge to a police search warrant
R (Ramsden) v IPCC [2013] EWHC 3969 (Admin)
defending a challenge to the IPCC’s decision not to take witness statements from witnesses to an alleged assault
R (Chief Constable of West Yorkshire) v IPCC [2014] EWCA Civ 1367
a challenge to the ambit of IPCC reports, led by Matthew Holdcroft
Georgina was Inquiries and Inquests Junior of the Year 2025 in the Chambers UK Awards. She is listed as a Star Individual for Inquests and Public Inquiries by Chambers UK and Tier 1 in the Legal 500.
She regularly appears on behalf of coroners, government departments, the police, social media companies, prison service, CPS, NHS Trusts, care homes and social services as well as other Interested Persons and families. She often appears in subsequent civil actions.
She was junior counsel for West Midlands Police in the Inquests following the Fishmongers’ Hall Terror Attacks, as sole counsel for the Labour Party in the inquest touching on the death of Carl Sargeant, for the Ministry of Justice in the inquest touching on the death of Max Clifford and as junior counsel for the Ministry of Defence in the inquest into the death of Geoff Gray (Deepcut).
She has a particular interest in inquests involving allegations of social media responsibility and those with a national security element (including those that convert into a public inquiry).
Georgina also has experience acting in inquests involving healthcare and alleged clinical negligence.
Inquest into the death of Chris Kaba
acting as junior counsel for the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (led by Jason Beer KC) in the forthcoming inquest
Inquests into the deaths arising from the Fishmongers’ Hall and London Bridge Terror Attacks
acting as junior counsel for West Midlands Police (led by Jason Beer KC)
Inquest into the death of Carl Sargeant
acting for the Labour Party; Mr Sargeant died following allegations of sexual misconduct
Inquest into the death of Max Clifford
acting for the MoJ; Mr Clifford died in custody allegedly as the result of delay in diagnosis of a heart condition
Inquest into the death of Geoff Gray
junior counsel for the MoD in the inquest arising from the death of a private at the Deepcut barracks
Inquest into the death of Carole Lovett
acted for the NHS Trust; Ms Lovett died after medical staff failed to calculate and act upon National Early Warning Signs scores
Inquest into the death of Stephen Akinyemi
acted for Cheshire Constabulary in the inquest arising from the shooting of Mr Akinyemi (and as junior in the subsequent civil action [2018] EWHC 34 (QB))
Inquest into the death of Kingsley Burrell
junior for West Midlands police following Mr Burrell’s death having been under police restraint
Inquest into the death of Jan McLean
acted for Surrey Police; Mr McLean died in police custody having ingested cocaine
Inquest into the death of George Mason
acted for social services in the inquest arising from the death of a dementia patient who absconded from a care home
Inquest into the deaths of Roger and Mathilde Lamb
acted for the family; the couple died in unusual circumstances while abroad.
Georgina was Inquests and Public Inquiries Junior of the Year 2025 in the Chambers UK Awards. She is listed as a Star Individual for Inquests and Public Inquiries by Chambers UK and Tier 1 in the Legal 500.
She has appeared in public inquiries for numerous core participants including HM Government and the police. She has also appeared in judicial reviews challenging the decisions of Inquiry Chairs, notably R (Cabinet Office) v Chair of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry [2023] EWHC 1702 (Admin) (on behalf of the Rt Hon. Boris Johnson, led by Lord Pannick KC) and E7 v Chair of the Azelle Rodney Inquiry [2014] EWHC 452 (Admin) (on behalf of E7, led by Samantha Leek KC).
Covid-19 Inquiry (for the Rt Hon. Boris Johnson)
Dawn Sturgess Inquiry (for HM Government)
Infected Blood Inquiry (for the Department for Health and Social Care)
Undercovering Policing (for two police forces)
22 July 2026
We are delighted to announce that Robert Cohen, Alex Ustych, Robert Talalay, Alice Meredith, Lissy Verrall-Withers, Paige Jones, Jack Palmer and…
Discover more12 June 2026
We are delighted to have been shortlisted in the following categories for the Legal 500…
Discover moreThe Rt Hon the Baroness Hallett DBE, Chair of the UK Covid-19…
This morning, Mr Justice Chamberlain handed down judgment in R (Ansari) v…
Instructing Georgina
Please contact James Cole if you have any questions or wish to instruct us.
Inquests and Public Inquiries:
“She is a real team player who combines intellectual firepower and good judgement with fantastic advocacy skills. Clients love her ability to explain difficult issues and strategies.”
“Georgina is hugely trusted in national security issues. She has unparalleled knowledge, academic rigour with a brilliant track record of high-profile clients.”
“Georgina has a phenomenal grasp of the law and gives very pragmatic advice.”
“Georgina is really clever and hard-working.”
“Georgina is a really good thinker and excellent with preparing statements. She has been instrumental in every step.”
Police Law:
“Georgina Wolfe is very strong, she is top-class.”
“Georgina’s expertise is second to none. Her impressive ability to think on her feet and provide tailored solutions to nuanced issues faced throughout the inquiry process has been invaluable.”
“Georgina Wolfe is a total star, people love her. She is a very safe pair of hands, just excellent.”
“Georgina Wolfe is a proper, proper talent. She is the best police law junior. She is incredible really, she buzzes with enthusiasm and is incredibly collaborative.”
“Georgina is an amazing team player, very easy to get along with. She has very good judgement and is very good at handling clients. She is very personable but also not afraid to deliver tricky advice.”
Inquests and Inquiries
“Georgina Wolfe is ‘a real expert who wears her superb intellect lightly’.”
“She is able to handle the most demanding cases in this area. She sees through a case quickly and communicates strengths and weaknesses with equal measures of tact and clarity.”
Inquests and Public Inquiries:
“Georgina is genuinely an exceptional barrister. She is extremely academically able but she combines that with a wonderful way with clients.”
“She is friendly and easy to work with. She has a good grip on cases and a good handle on clients.”
Police Law:
“She is very supportive and great to work with.”
Administrative and Public Law:
‘She is enormously hard-working and also indomitably positive in her approach. She sails through crises and is never daunted.’
Inquests and Inquiries:
Georgina is without question a superstar. She combines huge intelligence, amazing attention to detail, strategic insight and wonderful client care.’
‘Georgina is by far and away the best police law junior at the Bar. She is efficient, hard-working, and on top of every detail.’ (Police Law)
“She has expert knowledge and insight into wider concerns. She is extremely approachable and always available to advise.” (Police Law)
“Georgina is great with complex medical matters and great with clients; she is well trusted by government departments.” (Inquests and Public Inquiries)
“She is incredibly hard-working and great on her feet.” (Inquests and Public Inquiries)
“Georgina is very strong on paper; she is an organised and persuasive advocate, who is methodical and personable in conference and a real joy to work with.” (Police Law)
“She is absolutely fantastic: very bright and a lovely person. She has a great manner with clients and opponents.”
‘First class for both inquiries and inquests. She gets to the heart of things quickly and robustly, and clients love her approachable but no-nonsense approach. Very sought after for difficult inquest and inquiry work, where she is particularly trusted in national security matters.’
“An effective advocate with a phenomenal brain.” (Police Law)
“Bright, personable and talented.” (Police Law)
“She is a staggeringly hard-working barrister who has an absolutely meticulous attention to detail and incredible knowledge of inquest law.” (Inquests & Public Inquiries)
“A friendly advocate at the same time as being tough and strategic.” (Inquests & Public Inquiries)
“Georgina has crystalline clarity of thought, which coupled with a comprehensive knowledge of coronial law and a deep insight into the workings of inquests, makes her the ideal choice of counsel. Her technical skills, as well as the ability to express arguments in writing, are coupled with an appreciation of the wider landscape and the ability to think strategically. She is a go-to choice as a junior on inquests and inquiries.” (Inquest and Inquiries)
“A polished, very talented advocate who commands the confidence of the court.” (Police Law – Defendant)
A “fantastic barrister” who is “superb with clients” and “extremely personable.” (Police Law)
“Georgina is absolutely stellar. She has a huge brain and she’s fiercely intelligent. She’s firm with clients in a good way and doesn’t get pushed around by anyone.” (Inquests and Inquiries)
“She has brilliant soft skills in an inquest.” (Inquests and Inquiries)
“She has been incredibly helpful at tackling very difficult cases at short notice.” (Inquests and Inquiries)
“A polished, very talented advocate who commands the confidence of the court.”
“A first-rate lawyer. She has a deep and complete understanding of coronial law, and can perceive how the coroner will react and provide measured and precise advice adapted to the particular circumstances of the inquest.”
“She is an outstanding advocate, logical, methodical, and easily gains the respect of the court; a star” (Police Law)
“She’s an able, bright, delightful person and a pleasure to work with. I can’t speak highly enough of her.” (Inquests and Public Inquiries)
“Superb junior with an impressive capacity to absorb paperwork, allied with impressive courtroom advocacy. One to watch: a real hard worker and very bright” (Police Law)
“She’s very well prepared, easy to work with and determined. She’s good at thinking about all the players in the hearing, including the coroner, jury and media, and is very tactful.”
“She has an assured written style and is a very shrewd judge of character and of case tactics.” (Inquests and Inquiries)
“Insightful, knowledgeable and tactfully astute. She is aware of what’s going on and what the issues are for the police.” (Police Law)
“A very impressive, capable advocate who is very good on paper.” (Police Law)
“She’s very bright, hugely personable and fantastically efficient. She’s on top of every point in a case and leaves no stone unturned.” (Inquests and Public Inquiries)
‘Bright and very capable.’ (Police Law – Defendant)
“She is excellent. She has an incredible grasp of the documents, is excellent with the families and has a great grasp of the facts.” (Inquest and Inquiries)
“She is a really good advocate who doesn’t make unnecessary points. She is extremely persuasive but in a very gentle manner.” (Inquest and Inquiries)
“She is bright, approachable and excellent on paper and on her feet.”
“Her drafting is fantastic.”
“She is a real hard worker and very bright.”
“She has acknowledged sector expertise, and an accessible and approachable manner.” (Police Law – Defendant)
“Can cut to the chase.”
“Very bright and good to work with.”
“Incredibly industrious.”
Click here to view
