Background

Conor’s practice includes public/ human rights, police, data/ information, inquests/ inquiries and firearms law.

Conor Monighan is a diligent barrister who delivers high quality work in complex cases. His clients range from private clients to regulators and state bodies (including the police and the Government). The quality of his oral submissions have been praised by the Divisional Court.

He acts in sensitive and high-value cases before a range of courts and tribunals, including the Court of Appeal and the High Court as leading counsel.

Recent instructions include:

Public law cases:

  • X: Leading counsel in an ongoing public law case concerning the sex offender regime.
  • Z: Sole counsel in an ongoing application for judicial review in the Court of Appeal.
  • R (oao Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire) v Peterborough Crown Court: Judicial review concerning the test for Public Interest Immunity vis a vis Closed Material Proceedings (led by Charlotte Ventham KC). The Divisional Court praised the quality of Conor’s oral submissions.
  • Chief Constable of Humberside v Morgan: Public law case concerning the power of lower courts to suspend their own orders pending an appeal and the impact of the ECHR on the closure order regime (led by John-Paul Waite).
  • R (oao Commissioner of the Metropolis) v Kingston Upon-Thames Crown Court: Judicial review concerning the availability of Closed Material Proceedings (led by Charlotte Ventham KC).
  • Commissioner v Malik : Leading public law case re costs awards against public bodies, following which Statutory Guidance was altered (led by Russell Fortt).

Major public inquiries:

Data/ information law cases:

  • S: Subject Access Request case in the High Court concerning Part 7 vs Part 8 claims.

Sensitive cases (e.g. involving firearms/ Public Interest Immunity):

  • H: Firearms case involving Counter Terrorism Policing and public interest immunity.

Inquests:

As a junior in demand, Conor often opposes senior members of the Bar. He is known for his personable approach and client care, leading to repeat instructions.

Conor is on the Executive Committee of the Human Rights Lawyers’ Association (“HRLA”) and the UK’s leading human rights blog has published over fifty of his articles.

Conor’s clerks can be contacted on 020 7410 2000.

Expertise

Conor has a strong  public/administrative law practice and is always pleased to assist clients with such cases. The quality of Conor’s oral submissions (in a significant judicial review) have been praised by the Divisional Court. His proficiency is such that he has been instructed as leading counsel in an ongoing public law challenge.

Conor has particular strength in sensitive cases and human rights claims. He is on the Human Rights Lawyers Association’s (“HRLA”) Executive Committee and the UK’s leading human rights blog has published fifty of his articles.

He maintains his knowledge of the field through his long-standing membership of the Administrative Law Bar Association (ALBA), the HRLA and the Young Public Law Group (YPLG).

Conor’s clerks can be contacted on 020 7410 2000.

 

Featured Public and Human Rights Law cases


X

Leading counsel in an ongoing public law case concerning the sex offender regime.


Z

Defending a judicial review permission decision before the Court of Appeal (as sole counsel).


R. (on the application of Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire) v Peterborough Crown Court [2025] EWHC 1452 (Admin)

Judicial review concerning the test for Public Interest Immunity vis a vis Closed Material Proceedings (led by Charlotte Ventham KC). The Divisional Court praised the quality of Conor’s oral submissions.


Chief Constable of Humberside v Morgan [2024] EWHC 2859 (Admin)

Challenge concerning the lower court’s alleged power to suspend injunctive orders pending an appeal and the impact of the ECHR on the closure order regime (led by John-Paul Waite)


Commissioner v Kingston Upon-Thames Crown Court [2023] EWHC 1938 (Admin)

Judicial review concerning the availability of Closed Material Proceedings (led by Charlotte Ventham KC).


Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Malik [2023] EWHC 3213 (Admin)

Leading authority on costs awards against public bodies and the correct test for Stalking Protection cases (led by Russell Fortt).

As a police law specialist, Conor has experience of the full range of police law including: civil actions, judicial reviews/ appeals by way of case stated, data claims, inquests, high-profile/ complex civil applications made by the police (e.g. SPOs) and firearms cases.

Conor has particular expertise in sensitive cases, including where there are Public Interest Immunity issues and/ or a counter-terrorism element.

 

Judicial Reviews/ Appeals by way of Case Stated

Conor has been instructed in a number of nationally significant judicial reviews on behalf of police forces. These include:

     

    Civil Claims & Operational Policing

    Conor regularly represents Forces in civil claims. For example, he recently advised on a novel DSD style case arising from an allegedly deficient investigation into a potentially prolific rapist. Conor has advised on wrongful arrest claims, s.59 CJPA applications, search warrant matters, PII/ CMP applications etc.

     

    Firearms

    Conor is a leading firearms barrister – please see the tab below for more information.

     

    Civil Applications

    Conor has considerable expertise in civil applications made by the police (e.g. SPOs). He is often instructed in high-profile and complex cases, particularly where there is a PII/ CMP element. Recent examples include:

    • Leading counsel in an ongoing public law challenge to the SHPO regime.
    • Chief Constable of Humberside v Morgan: Leading authority on closure orders.
    • Urgently advising on, and running, nationally important High Court appeals relating to SROs/ SPOs (etc)– e.g. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Malik [2023] EWHC 3213 (Admin).
    • Successfully defending a 5-day SPO appeal which resulted in an indefinite order being granted.
    • Multi-million-pound POCA cases (including compensation claims, for which he was led by Alan Payne KC).
    • An application by a Chief Constable against one of its own officers and another against an ex-fireman.
    • Advising on novel applications – such as a Force’s first Stalking Protection Order appeal.

    Conor’s clerks can be contacted on 020 7410 2000.

     

    Featured Police Law cases


    X

    Leading counsel in an ongoing public law challenge concerning orders to manage sex offenders.


    Z

    Defending a judicial review permission decision (as sole counsel in the Court of Appeal).


    R. (on the application of Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire) v Peterborough Crown Court [2025] EWHC 1452 (Admin)

    Judicial review concerning Public Interest Immunity and Closed Material Proceedings (led by Charlotte Ventham KC). The Divisional Court praised the quality of Conor’s oral submissions.


    Chief Constable of Humberside v Morgan [2024] EWHC 2859 (Admin):

    Public law case concerning the power of lower courts to suspend their own orders pending an appeal and the impact of the ECHR on the closure order regime (led by John-Paul Waite).


    R (Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis) v Kingston Crown Court [2023] EWHC 1938 (Admin)

    Important judicial review concerning the availability of Closed Material Proceedings (led by Charlotte Ventham KC).


    Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Malik [2023] EWHC 3213 (Admin)

    Leading authority on costs awards against the police, building upon Perinpanathan (led by Russell Fortt).


    POCA case

    Acting for the Interested Party in a judicial review concerning the limits of the High Court’s power to issue quashing orders.

    Conor regularly advises on data protection/ information law issues throughout his practice. He is well-versed in the realities of data protection litigation and regularly trains other lawyers on the subject.

    Although Conor’s practice in this field is broad, recent examples of his work includes:

    • Appearing in the High Court in a Subject Access Request (SAR) case, which raised issues about Part 7 vs Part 8 claims.
    • Advising on the lawfulness of proposed disclosures.
    • Advising a law firm on the lawful retention of client data.
    • Providing tactical advice on threatened litigation.
    • Obtaining a strike-out order on behalf of a public authority, drawing upon his human rights practice (Conor is on the Executive committee of Human Rights Lawyers).

    He is a regular contributor to 5 Essex Court’s ‘Data Brief’, which sends monthly updates to clients working in this fascinating field.

    Conor’s clerks can be contacted on 020 7410 2000.

    Conor is regularly instructed to represent IPs at inquests. Conor has particular expertise in Article 2 ECHR inquests, drawing upon his role on the Executive Committee of Human Rights Lawyers (‘HRLA’).

    Cases of note include:

    • Inquest into the death of Kevin Jarvis: Inquest concerning the death of a road worker killed following a police pursuit.
    • Inquest into the death of CD: Inquest relating to the death of a man following the attendance of Armed Police (including an ACC).
    • Inquest into the death of Leah Croucher: Inquest concerning the killing of a 19-year-old girl on her way to work.
    • The Jermaine Baker (Police Shooting) Inquiry: Acted on behalf of the Home Office, led by Claire Palmer, following the conversion of the inquest into a public inquiry.
    • X: Acted on behalf of the Police following the tragic death of a man with a complex history of mental health issues. The coroner’s conclusion ultimately praised the Force for its conduct.

    As part of Conor’s inquest practice, he regularly contributes towards 5 Essex Court’s ‘Inquest Authorities Index’ – available here.

    Conor is an experienced junior, having acted in:

    • The Post Office/ Horizon IT Inquiry (for a former CEO of the Post Office, instructed by Mishcon de Reya).
    • The Infected Blood Inquiry (for the Department of Health and Social Care).
    • The Grenfell Tower Inquiry (for a large commercial organisation).
    • The Jermaine Baker (Police Shooting) Inquiry (for the Home Office).

    Conor can assist with the full range of public inquiry work. He has experience of preparing witnesses, writing inquiry submissions and drafting Rule 9 responses – including for the Government, a well-known former Secretary of State and private clients.

    He believes in the importance of properly preparing witnesses and recently assisted a key witness whose evidence was praised by the Chair. Conor has particular expertise in sensitive and high-profile matters.

    He is currently acting for a private client in the Post Office/ Horizon IT Inquiry.

    Conor’s clerks can be contacted on 020 7410 2000.

    Conor is a leading firearms and explosives licensing barrister. He is regularly instructed in significant, sensitive and high-profile firearms/ shotgun appeals and frequently opposes KCs.

    Given his expertise, Conor is usually instructed in complex/ high-profile cases. He acts for a very large number of clients across the country in this field.

    He is frequently instructed in numerous Public Interest Immunity firearms appeals, having been counsel in both Chief Constable of Cambridge v the Crown Court at Peterborough [2025] and Commissioner v Kingston Upon-Thames Crown Court [2023] – i.e. the two leading authorities on firearms appeals and the availability Closed Material Proceedings.

    Conor regularly advises senior officers on gun licensing and has been invited to join the National Firearms Licensing Working Group in light of his expertise.

    Conor’s clerks can be contacted on 020 7410 2000.

     

    Featured Firearms and Explosives cases


    Chief Constable of Cambridge v the Crown Court at Peterborough [2025]:

    Leading authority on Public Interest Immunity and Closed Material Proceedings firearms cases (led by Charlotte Ventham KC).


    Commissioner v Kingston Upon-Thames Crown Court [2023]

    Junior counsel in the most significant firearms case for many years (led by Charlotte Ventham KC).


    Mr R v Commissioner

    Believed to be the first case in which an appeal was refused following a successful Public Interest Immunity application.


    H

    Firearms appeal brought by an Appellant with extreme-right wing sympathies, necessitating the involvement of Counter-Terrorism Policing.


    A

    Appeal brought by a domestic abuser (successfully opposed a KC who specialises in the field).


    B

    Succeeded in an appeal brought by a paedophile, having cross-examined a retired High Court judge who supported the appeal.


    X

    Instructed in firearms appeals brought by two members of the aristocracy who are household names.

    Latest News & Events

    Read all

    Date:
    Thu 22nd Jan 2026
    Time:
    12:30pm - 1:30pm
    Discover more

    The latest highlights from our Data Protection and Information Law experts are now available. The…

    Discover more

    Barrister of the month: Conor Monighan

    Name: Conor Monighan Role: Barrister and Executive Committee Officer of the…

    Instructing Conor
    Please contact Dan Waple if you have any questions or wish to instruct us.

    Call +44 (0)20 7410 2000 or click here to email

    Education & Qualifications

    • 2014 – 2017: BA (Hons) in English Literature, Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge University.
    • 2018: Graduate Diploma in Law, City, University of London
    • 2019: Bar Professional Training Course, City, University of London
    • 2019: Master of Laws (LLM) in Legal Practice, City, University of London
    • 2019: Called to the Bar by Gray’s Inn.

    Memberships

    • The Human Rights Lawyers’ Association (HRLA), Executive Committee Member.
    • Administrative Law Bar Association (ALBA).
    • Young Public Lawyers’ Group (YPLG).

    Appointments

    • 2024 – Attorney General’s C Panel of Counsel

    Awards

    • 2019: The Stephen Seabrooke Memorial Prize (for performance on the BPTC) – City Law School.
    • 2018: Roger Cox Award – Gray’s Inn.
    • 2017: CPE Award – Gray’s Inn.
    • 2016: Winner of the Times Advocacy Competition.

    Click here to view

    Featured

    Affiliations

     

    Affiliations

     

    Affiliations

    Portfolio Builder

    Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

    Download    Add to portfolio   
    Portfolio
    Title Type CV Email

    Remove All

    Download


    Click here to share this shortlist.
    (It will expire after 30 days.)