High Court ruling on consultation requirement for civil injunctions: R(AM) v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [2021] EWHC 796 (Admin)

7 April 2021

In a ruling handed down on 31 March 2021 in R(AM) v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [2021] EWHC 796 (Admin), Steyn J gave guidance on the consultation requirement for civil injunctions against youths under Part 1 of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014. Steyn J held that upon breach of a civil injunction, there is no requirement on the applicant to consult with the local youth offending team prior to arrest, or prior the respondent’s first appearance in court. It was noted that when an injunction includes a power of arrest, breach proceedings are automatically triggered. Steyn J also considered the use of maps accompanying civil injunctive orders and held that an exclusion zone on map must be clearly delineated. 

Remi Reichhold acted for the Chief Constable of West Midlands Police. 

Related areas

Police Law


Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and event updates.



16 April 2024

Chambers is delighted to announce that Head of Chambers, Jason Beer KC is one of only…

Discover more

14 February 2022

The first hearings of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry commenced today.  Previously a non-statutory…

Discover more

19 December 2023

A message from Head of Chambers, Jason Beer KC, looking back at the past 12…

Discover more

Portfolio Builder

Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Title Type CV Email

Remove All


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)